得了梅毒会有什么症状| 秋葵炒什么好吃| 梦到坟墓是什么意思| cc是什么意思| c反应蛋白是什么意思| 表白送什么礼物好| b2c模式是什么意思| 命好的人都有什么特征| 为什么长斑| 额窦炎吃什么药效果好| 咳嗽有痰吃什么药好得最快最有效| 褙子是什么| 什么的黎明| OK镜适合什么年龄| 小孩白头发是什么原因引起的| f是什么| 党委常委是什么级别| 依赖是什么意思| 梦见很多坟墓是什么意思| 什么是共情| 桂枝和肉桂有什么区别| 文化大革命是什么时候开始的| 运动后喝什么水最好| 啤酒是什么酿造的| 讲师是什么级别| 蚊子害怕什么| 风的孩子叫什么| 存在是什么| 怀孕前三个月为什么不能告诉别人| 什么原因引起耳石症| 肚子老是胀是什么原因| 脸上长粉刺是什么原因| 为什么会脑梗| 膂力是什么意思| 饭后散步有什么好处| 恩替卡韦片是什么药| 白玫瑰的花语是什么| 借口是什么意思| 痛风吃什么菜比较好| 纤支镜主要检查什么| 牛后腿肉适合做什么| 缺钾吃什么食物| 一什么屏风| 胃酸恶心想吐什么原因| 脸部浮肿什么原因| 编程是什么专业| ped是什么意思| 沙金是什么| 精神分裂症吃什么药| 3月5日什么星座| 女人的秘密是什么| 便秘了吃什么容易排便| 心胸狭窄是什么意思| 梅花在什么季节开放| 下巴上有痣代表什么| 乳头很痒是什么原因| 肌酐300多属于什么期| 膀胱炎是什么症状| 锁阳泡酒有什么功效| 柔肝是什么意思| 破伤风是什么| 血常规能查出什么| 火可念什么| 尿液有白色絮状物是什么原因| md是什么学位| 磨牙是什么原因| 为什么会得阑尾炎| 吃了虾不能吃什么水果| 城堡是什么意思| 为什么一低头就晕| pid是什么| 男宠是什么意思| 拉肚子拉稀水吃什么药管用| 印字五行属什么| 四月十六日是什么星座| 什么空调最好| 血糖高喝什么好| 来例假喝红糖水有什么好处| dhea是什么药| 痔疮很痒是什么原因| 腹泻吃什么药最有效| xo酱是什么酱| 地心引力是什么意思| 古字五行属什么| 番薯什么时候传入中国| 白细胞偏高是什么意思| 114是什么意思| 感冒低烧是什么原因| 什么下奶最快最多| 酱油什么时候发明的| 什么是食品添加剂| 声线是什么意思| ifound是什么牌子| 妇科清洁度3度用什么药治疗| 太阳鱼吃什么食物| 下面有异味是什么原因| 为什么尿液一直是黄的| 你什么意思| 人生导师是什么意思| 通房是什么意思| 颜控什么意思| 雏形是什么意思| 频次是什么意思| 苡米和薏米有什么区别| 嗓子痒痒老想咳嗽是什么原因| 血小板偏低是什么意思| 左眼皮跳是什么原因| 茉莉花茶有什么作用| 消渴是什么意思| 清理鱼缸粪便用什么鱼| 日本牛郎是干什么的| 荷花象征着什么| 青光眼有什么症状| 马克定食是什么意思| 梦见做春梦是什么意思| 为什么会做梦中梦| 后会无期什么意思| 冯庸大学现在叫什么| 胆固醇高吃什么| 绿油油的什么| 纯是什么意思| 管教有方是什么意思| 什么叫阴吹| 37岁属什么的生肖| 不典型鳞状细胞是什么意思| 九肚鱼是什么鱼| 秋水伊人是什么意思| 消化不良吃什么水果好| 山楂干泡水喝有什么功效| 唇红是什么原因| 甘油脂肪酸酯是什么| md是什么牌子| 为什么胸口疼| 保肝护肝吃什么药好| 西贝是什么| 吃什么补肾最快最有效| 白细胞酯酶是什么意思| 活性印染是什么意思| 砒霜是什么| 尿比重高是什么意思| 婚车头车一般用什么车| 申时是什么时候| 胃胀打嗝吃什么药| 牛三合生肖是什么| 睾丸潮湿吃什么药| acs是什么病| 舂米是什么意思| 感冒吃什么菜| 胃疼为什么后背也疼| 梦见自己怀孕了是什么意思| 胃疼胃胀用什么药效果最好| 烂好人什么意思| 梦到涨大水预示着什么| 40而不惑是什么意思| 大学记过处分有什么影响| 冰心原名是什么| 梦见自己流血是什么预兆| 绞肠痧是什么病| 金银花有什么功效和作用| 泌乳是什么意思| 鱼爱吃什么| 义愤填膺是什么意思| 车工是做什么的| 孩子半夜咳嗽是什么原因| 车万是什么意思| 7月24日什么星座| hb是什么意思| 孕妇吃榴莲对胎儿有什么好处| 6.8什么星座| 牙肿了吃什么消炎药| 喝中药为什么会拉肚子| 梦见小白兔是什么意思| 低血压是什么原因造成的| marni是什么牌子| 211是什么学校| 为什么男人喜欢吃槟榔| 50年属什么| 省纪委常委是什么级别| 梦见被蛇咬是什么意思| 腾冲有什么好玩的景点| 什么补蛋白最快的食物| 口发苦是什么原因| 为什么会流口水| 腰间盘突出有什么好的治疗方法| 火碱是什么东西| 什么是手淫| 感知力是什么意思| 吗啡是什么药| 土字五行属什么| 关塔那摩监狱为什么在古巴| 陈赫为什么离婚| 睑腺炎是什么原因造成| 小孩满月送什么礼物好| 言音读什么| 三次元是什么| 兆以上的计数单位是什么| 左旋肉碱是什么| 乳腺4a类是什么意思| 开日是什么意思| 皮肤湿疹用什么药膏| 脚为什么脱皮| 霉菌性阴道炎用什么药效果好| 癔症是什么病| 白化病有什么危害吗| 婴儿外阴粘连挂什么科| 继发性是什么意思| 看指甲去医院挂什么科| 挑疳积挑出来的是什么| 菠萝和凤梨有什么区别| 什么样的田野| 含字五行属什么| 喝太多水对身体有什么影响| 脸上老长痘痘是什么原因| 做梦梦见兔子是什么意思| 蕾丝是什么意思| 天意是什么意思| 鱼鳔是什么东西| 手腕发麻是什么原因| 溦是什么意思| 金黄色葡萄球菌是什么| ceo是什么意思| 鱼豆腐是用什么做的| 市长属于什么级别| 耳鸣吃什么药好| 给男生送什么礼物好| 月经期间吃什么补血| 什么叫化学| 四物汤什么时候喝| godiva是什么牌子| 犀牛吃什么| 他克莫司软膏治疗什么| 吃什么补钾快| 子宫肌瘤吃什么中药可以消除掉| 1994年属什么| 鸡属于什么类动物| 遥不可及是什么意思| 为什么很多人不去庐山| 萤火虫为什么越来越少| 丹参是什么样子的图片| 爱屋及乌什么意思| 声带白斑是什么病严重吗| 机油用什么能洗掉| mommy什么意思| 省委副书记什么级别| 佛历是什么意思| 小孩便秘吃什么药| 宝字五行属什么| 月经量多是什么原因引起的| 女性为什么会肾结石| 调制乳粉是什么意思| 束缚什么意思| 七个月宝宝能吃什么水果| 吗啡是什么| 振字五行属什么| 尿蛋白高吃什么食物好| 热感冒吃什么药好| 学五行属什么| 什么神什么注| 桑葚有什么好处| 为什么晚上不能照镜子| 尿道炎症吃什么药好| 病理报告是什么| 一什么沙发| 为什么孩子要跟爸爸姓| 百度Jump to content

交通运输部办公厅关于征求交通运输行业标准《网络...

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
百度 与此同时,蔡斯迪还要负责每天接送孩子上学,辅导孩子学习,做家务,家里的大小事都是她一人担当。

Climate change and civilizational collapse refers to a hypothetical risk that the negative impacts of climate change might reduce global socioeconomic complexity to the point that complex human civilization effectively ends around the world, with humanity reduced to a less developed state. This hypothetical risk is typically associated with the idea of a massive reduction of human population caused by the direct and indirect impacts of climate change, and also with a permanent reduction of Earth's carrying capacity. Finally, it is sometimes suggested that a civilizational collapse caused by climate change would soon be followed by human extinction.

Some researchers connect historical examples of societal collapse with adverse changes in local and/or global weather patterns. In particular, the 4.2-kiloyear event, a millennial-scale megadrought which took place in Africa and Asia between 5,000 and 4,000 years ago, has been linked with the collapse of the Old Kingdom in Egypt, the Akkadian Empire in Mesopotamia, the Liangzhu culture in the lower Yangtze River area and the Indus Valley Civilization.[1][2] In Europe, the General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century, which was defined by events such as crop failure and the Thirty Years' War, took place during the Little Ice Age. In 2011, a general connection was proposed between adverse climate variations and long-term societal crises during the preindustrial times.[3] Drought might have been a contributing factor to the Classic Maya collapse between the 7th and 9th centuries.[4] However, all of these events were limited to individual human societies: a collapse of the entire human civilization would be historically unprecedented.

Some of the more extreme warnings of civilizational collapse caused by climate change, such as a claim that civilization is highly likely to end by 2050, have attracted strong rebuttals from scientists.[5][6] The 2022 IPCC Sixth Assessment Report projects that human population would be in a range between 8.5 billion and 11 billion people by 2050. By the year 2100, the median population projection is at 11 billion people, while the maximum population projection is close to 16 billion people. The lowest projection for 2100 is around 7 billion, and this decline from present levels is primarily attributed to "rapid development and investment in education", with those projections associated with some of the highest levels of economic growth.[7] However, a minority[citation needed] of climate scientists have argued that higher levels of warming—between about 3 °C (5.4 °F) to 5 °C (9.0 °F) over preindustrial temperatures—may be incompatible with civilization, or that the lives of several billion people could no longer be sustained in such a world.[8][9][10][11] In 2022, they have called for a so-called "climate endgame" research agenda into the probability of these risks, which had attracted significant media attention and some scientific controversy.[12][13][14]

Some of the most high-profile writing on climate change and civilizational collapse has been written by non-scientists. Notable examples include "The Uninhabitable Earth"[15] by David Wallace-Wells and "What if we stopped pretending?" by Jonathan Franzen,[16] which were both criticized for scientific inaccuracy.[17][18] Opinion polling has provided evidence that youths across the world experience widespread climate anxiety,[19] with the term collapsology being coined in 2015 to describe a pessimistic worldview anticipating civilizational collapse due to climate anxiety.[20]

Suggested historical examples

[edit]
Ruins of Mohenjo-daro on the Indus River in Pakistan
The Mayan ruins of Palenque. Drought might have been a contributing factor to the Classic Maya collapse between the 7th and 9th centuries.

Archeologists have identified signs of a megadrought which lasted for a millennium between 5,000 and 4,000 years ago in Africa and Asia. The drying of the Green Sahara not only turned it into a desert but also disrupted the monsoon seasons in South and Southeast Asia and caused flooding in East Asia, which prevented successful harvests and the development of complex culture. It coincided with and may have caused the decline and the fall of the Akkadian Empire in Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley Civilization.[21] The dramatic shift in climate is known as the 4.2-kiloyear event.[22]

The highly advanced Indus Valley Civilization took root around 3000 BC in what is now northwestern India and Pakistan and collapsed around 1700 BC. Since the Indus script has yet to be deciphered, the causes of its de-urbanization[23] remain a mystery, but there is some evidence pointing to natural disasters.[24] Signs of a gradual decline began to emerge in 1900 BC, and two centuries later, most of the cities had been abandoned. Archeological evidence suggests an increase in interpersonal violence and in infectious diseases like leprosy and tuberculosis.[25][26] Historians and archeologists believe that severe and long-lasting drought and a decline in trade with Egypt and Mesopotamia caused the collapse.[27] Evidence for earthquakes has also been discovered. Sea level changes are also found at two possible seaport sites along the Makran coast which are now inland. Earthquakes may have contributed to decline of several sites by direct shaking damage or by changes in sea level or in water supply.[28][29][30]

More generally, recent research pointed to climate change as a key player in the decline and fall of historical societies in China, the Middle East, Europe, and the Americas. In fact, paleoclimatogical temperature reconstruction suggests that historical periods of social unrest, societal collapse, and population crash and significant climate change often occurred simultaneously. A team of researchers from Mainland China and Hong Kong were able to establish a causal connection between climate change and large-scale human crises in pre-industrial times. Short-term crises may be caused by social problems, but climate change was the ultimate cause of major crises, starting with economic depressions.[31] Moreover, since agriculture is highly dependent on climate, any changes to the regional climate from the optimum can induce crop failures.[32]

The Mongol conquests corresponded to a period of cooling in the Northern Hemisphere between the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, when the Medieval Warm Period was giving way to the Little Ice Age, which caused ecological stress. In Europe, the cooling climate did not directly facilitate the Black Death, but it caused wars, mass migration, and famine, which helped diseases spread.[32]

Modern discussion

[edit]

2000s

[edit]

As early as in 2004, a book titled Ecocriticism explored the connection between apocalypticism as expressed in religious contexts, and the secular apocalyptic interpretations of climate and environmental issues.[33] It argued that the tragic (preordained, with clearly delineated morality) or comic (focused on human flaws as opposed to inherent inevitability) apocalyptic framing was seen in the past works on environment, such as Rachel Carson's Silent Spring (1962), Paul and Anne Ehrlich's The Population Bomb (1972), and Al Gore's Earth in the Balance (1992).[34][35]

In the mid-2000s, James Lovelock gave predictions to the British newspapers The Independent and The Guardian, where he suggested that much of Europe will have turned to desert and "billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable" by the end of the 21st century.[36][37] In 2008, he was quoted in The Guardian as saying that 80% of humans will perish by 2100, and that the climate change responsible for that will last 100,000 years.[38] By 2012, he admitted that climate change had proceeded slower than he expected.[39]

2010s–present

[edit]

In late 2010s, several articles have attracted attention for their predictions of apocalyptic impacts caused by climate change. Firstly, there was "The Uninhabitable Earth",[15] a July 2017 New York magazine article by David Wallace-Wells, which had become the most-read story in the history of the magazine,[40] and was later adapted into a book. Another was "What if we stopped pretending?", an article written for The New Yorker by Jonathan Franzen in September 2019.[16] Both articles were heavily criticized by the fact-checking organization Climate Feedback for the numerous inaccuracies about tipping points in the climate system and other aspects of climate change research.[17][18]

Other examples of this genre include "What Comes After the Coming Climate Anarchy?", a year 2022 article for TIME magazine by Parag Khanna, which had asserted that hundreds of millions of people dying in the upcoming years and the global population standing at 6 billion by the year 2050 was a plausible worst-case scenario.[41] Further, some reports, such as "the 2050 scenario" from the Australian Breakthrough – National Centre for Climate Restoration[42] and the self-published Deep Adaptation paper by Jem Bendell[43] had attracted substantial media coverage by making allegations that the outcomes of climate change are underestimated by the conventional scientific process.[44][45][46][47][48][49] Those reports did not go through the peer review process, and the scientific assessment of these works finds them of very low credibility.[5][50]

Notably, subsequent writing by David Wallace-Wells had stepped back from the claims he made in either version of The Uninhabitable Earth. In 2022, he authored a feature article for The New York Times, which was titled "Beyond Catastrophe: A New Climate Reality Is Coming Into View".[51] The following year, Kyle Paoletta argued in Harper's Magazine that the shift in tone made by David Wallace-Wells was indicative of a larger trend in media coverage of climate change taking place.[52]

In October 2024, 44 climate scientists published an open letter to the Nordic Council of Ministers,[53] claiming that according to scientific studies in the past few years, the risk of collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation has been greatly underestimated, that it can occur in the next few decades, and that some changes are already happening.[54] Climate change may weaken the AMOC through increases in ocean heat content and elevated flows of freshwater from melting ice sheets.[55] The collapse of the AMOC would be a severe climate catastrophe, resulting in a cooling of the Northern Hemisphere.[56] It would have devastating and irreversible impacts especially for Nordic countries, but also for other parts of the world.[57] Others disagree.[58]

Scientific consensus and controversy

[edit]

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report projects that human population would be in a range between 8.5 billion and 11 billion people (median average - 9.75 billion people) by 2050; the median population projection for the year 2100 is at 11 billion people, while the maximum population projection is close to 16 billion people. The lowest projection for 2100 is around 7 billion, and this decline from present levels is primarily attributed to "rapid development and investment in education", with those projections associated with some of the highest levels of economic growth.[7] In November 2021, Nature surveyed the authors of the first part of the IPCC assessment report: out of 92 respondents, 88% have agreed that the world is experiencing a "climate crisis", yet when asked if they experience "anxiety, grief or other distress because of concerns over climate change?" just 40% answered "Yes, infrequently", with a further 21% responding "Yes, frequently", and the remaining 39% answering "No".[59] Similarly, when a high-profile paper warning of "the challenges of avoiding a ghastly future" was published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, its authors have noted that "even if major catastrophes occur during this interval, they would unlikely affect the population trajectory until well into the 22nd Century", and "there is no way—ethically or otherwise (barring extreme and unprecedented increases in human mortality)—to avoid rising human numbers and the accompanying overconsumption."[60][61]

Only a minority of publishing scientists have been more open to apocalyptic rhetoric. In 2009, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, the Emeritus Director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, stated that if global warming reached 4 °C (7.2 °F) over the present levels, then the human population would likely be reduced to 1 billion.[8] In 2015, he complained that this remark was frequently misinterpreted as a call for active human population control rather than a prediction.[62] In a January 2019 interview for The Ecologist, he claimed that if we find reasons to give up on action, then there's a very big risk of things turning to an outright catastrophe, with the civilization ending and almost everything which had been built up over the past two thousand years destroyed.[9]

In May 2019, The Guardian interviewed several climate scientists about a world where 4 °C (7.2 °F) of warming over the preindustrial has occurred by 2100: one of them was Johan Rockstr?m, who was reported to state "It’s difficult to see how we could accommodate a billion people or even half of that" in such a scenario.[10] Around the same time, similar claims were made by the Extinction Rebellion activist Roger Hallam, who said in a 2019 interview that climate change may "kill 6 billion people by 2100"—a remark which was soon questioned by the BBC News presenter Andrew Neil[63] and criticized as scientifically unfounded by Climate Feedback.[6] In November 2019, The Guardian article was corrected, acknowledging that Rockstr?m was misquoted and his real remarks were "It’s difficult to see how we could accommodate eight billion people or maybe even half of that".[10]

In 2022, the United Nations published a report called Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction’ (GAR2022) saying societal collapse due to extensive crossing of planetary boundaries is possible. The UN report call to preventive policies including incorporating planetary boundaries in the SDG targets. Allegedly, a senior advisor to the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction and contributor to the Global Assessment Report who spoke to Byline Times on condition of anonymity said, that the report was strongly censored before being published, so that “The GAR2022 is an eviscerated skeleton of what was included in earlier drafts”. However, the study which mentioned this possibility and was included in GAR2022 was a scenario study with no actual measurements or timescales.[64]

Climate endgame

[edit]

In August 2022, Schellnhuber, Rockstr?m and several other researchers, many of whom were associated with Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge, have published a paper in PNAS which argued that a lack of what they called "integrated catastrophe assessment" meant that the risk of societal collapse, or even eventual human extinction caused by climate change and its interrelated impacts such as famine (crop loss, drought), extreme weather (hurricanes, floods), war (caused by the scarce resources), systemic risk (relating to migration, famine, or conflict), and disease was "dangerously underexplored".[13][12] The paper suggested that the following terms should be actively used in the future research.

Conceptual causal loop diagram of cascading global climate failure used in the "Climate endgame" paper.[12]
Defining key terms in the Climate Endgame agenda[12]
Term Definition
Latent risk Risk that is dormant under one set of conditions but becomes active under another set of conditions.
Risk cascade Chains of risk occurring when an adverse impact triggers a set of linked risks.
Systemic risk The potential for individual disruptions or failures to cascade into a system-wide failure.
Extreme climate change Mean global surface temperature rise of 3 °C (5.4 °F) or more above preindustrial levels by 2100.
Extinction risk The probability of human extinction within a given timeframe.
Extinction threat A plausible and significant contributor to total extinction risk.
Societal fragility The potential for smaller damages to spiral into global catastrophic or extinction risk due to societal vulnerabilities, risk cascades, and maladaptive responses.
Societal collapse Significant sociopolitical fragmentation and/or state failure along with the relatively rapid, enduring, and significant loss capital, and systems identity; this can lead to large-scale increases in mortality and morbidity.
Global catastrophic risk The probability of a loss of 25% of the global population and the severe disruption of global critical systems (such as food) within a given timeframe (years or decades).
Global catastrophic threat A plausible and significant contributor to global catastrophic risk; the potential for climate change to be a global catastrophic threat can be referred to as "catastrophic climate change".
Global decimation risk The probability of a loss of 10% (or more) of global population and the severe disruption of global critical systems (such as food) within a given timeframe (years or decades).
Global decimation threat A plausible and significant contributor to global decimation risk.
Endgame territory Levels of global warming and societal fragility that are judged sufficiently probable to constitute climate change as an extinction threat.
Worst-case warming The highest empirically and theoretically plausible level of global warming.
Overlap between state fragility, extreme heat, and nuclear and biological catastrophic hazards.
Overlap between state fragility, extreme heat, and nuclear and biological catastrophic hazards according to the "Endgame" paper[12]
Overlap between future population distribution and extreme heat.
Overlap between future population distribution and extreme heat according to the same paper[12] This graphic was criticized for using a scenario considered unlikely and worse than the present trajectory.[14]

The paper was very high-profile, receiving extensive media coverage[13][65] and over 180,000 page views by 2023. It was also the subject of several response papers from other scientists, all of which were also published at PNAS. Most have welcomed its proposals while disagreeing on some of the details of the suggested agenda.[66][67][68][69] However, a response paper authored by Roger Pielke Jr. and fellow University of Colorado Boulder researchers Matthew Burgess and Justin Ritchie was far more critical. They have argued that one of the paper's main arguments—the supposed lack of research into higher levels of global warming—was baseless, as on the contrary, the scenarios of highest global warming called RCP 8.5 and SSP5-8.5 have accounted for around half of all mentions in the "impacts" section of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, and SSP3-7, the scenario of slightly lower warming used in some of the paper's graphics, had also assumed greater emissions and more extensive coal use than what had been projected by the International Energy Agency. They have also argued that just as the past projections of overpopulation were used to justify one-child policy in China, a disproportionate focus on apocalyptic scenarios may be used to justify despotism and fascist policies.[14] In response, the authors of the original paper wrote that in their view, catastrophic risks may occur even at lower levels of warming due to risks involving human responses and societal fragility. They also suggested that instead of the one-child policy, a better metaphor for responses to extreme risks research would be the 1980s exploration of the impacts of nuclear winter, which had spurred nuclear disarmament efforts.[70]

"Youth vs Apocalypse" banner seen at San Francisco Youth Climate Strike in 2019

Timescale

[edit]

Bill McGuire (a professor of Geophysical and Climate Hazards and the author of Hothouse Earth: An Inhabitant’s Guide) suggest that the collapse may occur by 2050.[71]

A study published in the Yale Journal of Industrial Ecology in the year of 2020, suggest that "current business-as-usual trajectory of global civilization is heading toward the terminal decline of economic growth within the coming decade—and at worst, could trigger societal collapse by around 2040".[72]

Public opinion

[edit]

Some public polling shows that beliefs in civilizational collapse or even human extinction have become widespread amongst the general population in many countries. In 2021, a publication in The Lancet surveyed 10,000 people aged 16–25 years in ten countries (Australia, Brazil, Finland, France, India, Nigeria, Philippines, Portugal, the UK, and the US): one of its findings was 55% of respondents agreeing with the statement "humanity is doomed".[19]

In 2020, a survey by a French think tank Jean Jaurès Foundation found that in five developed countries (France, Germany, Italy, the UK and the US), a significant fraction of the population agreed with the statement that "civilization as we know it will collapse in the years to come"; the percentages ranged from 39% in Germany and 52% or 56% in the US and the UK to 65% in France and 71% in Italy.[20]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Gibbons, Ann (1993). "How the Akkadian Empire Was Hung Out to Dry". Science. 261 (5124): 985. Bibcode:1993Sci...261..985G. doi:10.1126/science.261.5124.985. PMID 17739611.
  2. ^ Li, Chun-Hai; Li, Yong-Xiang; Zheng, Yun-Fei; Yu, Shi-Yong; Tang, Ling-Yu; Li, Bei-Bei; Cui, Qiao-Yu (August 2018). "A high-resolution pollen record from East China reveals large climate variability near the Northgrippian-Meghalayan boundary (around 4200 years ago) exerted societal influence". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 512: 156–165. Bibcode:2018PPP...512..156L. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.07.031. ISSN 0031-0182. S2CID 133896325.
  3. ^ Zhang, David D.; Lee, Harry F.; Wang, Cong; Li, Baosheng; Pei, Qing; Zhang, Jane; An, Yulun (18 October 2011). "The causality analysis of climate change and large-scale human crisis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (42): 17296–17301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104268108. PMC 3198350. PMID 21969578. S2CID 33451915.
  4. ^ "What really caused the collapse of the Maya civilization?". National Geographic.
  5. ^ a b Scott Johnson (9 June 2019). "Claim that human civilization could end in 30 years is speculative, not supported with evidence". Science Feedback. Climate Feedback. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  6. ^ a b Scott Johnson (22 August 2019). "Prediction by Extinction Rebellion's Roger Hallam that climate change will kill 6 billion people by 2100 is unsupported". Science Feedback. Climate Feedback. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  7. ^ a b Mycoo, M., M. Wairiu, D. Campbell, V. Duvat, Y. Golbuu, S. Maharaj, J. Nalau, P. Nunn, J. Pinnegar, and O. Warrick, 2022: Chapter 3: Mitigation pathways compatible with long-term goals. In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change [ K. Riahi, R.Schaeffer, J.Arango, K. Calvin, C. Guivarch, T. Hasegawa, K. Jiang, E. Kriegler, R. Matthews, G. P. Peters, A. Rao, S. Robertson, A. M. Sebbit, J. Steinberger, M. Tavoni, D. P. van Vuuren]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 463–464 |doi= 10.1017/9781009157926.005
  8. ^ a b Kanter, James (13 March 2009). "Scientist: Warming Could Cut Population to 1 Billion". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 May 2010.
  9. ^ a b "'It's nonlinearity - stupid!'". The Ecologist. 3 January 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  10. ^ a b c Vince, Gaia (18 May 2019). "The heat is on over the climate crisis. Only radical measures will work". The Observer. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  11. ^ Carrington, Damian (30 September 2023). "We're not doomed yet': climate scientist Michael Mann on our last chance to save human civilisation". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
  12. ^ a b c d e f Kemp, Luke; Xu, Chi; Depledge, Joanna; Ebi, Kristie L.; Gibbins, Goodwin; Kohler, Timothy A.; Rockstr?m, Johan; Scheffer, Marten; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Steffen, Will; Lenton, Timothy M. (23 August 2022). "Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (34): e2108146119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11908146K. doi:10.1073/pnas.2108146119. PMC 9407216. PMID 35914185. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
  13. ^ a b c "Climate endgame: risk of human extinction 'dangerously underexplored'". The Guardian. 1 August 2022. Retrieved 15 September 2022.
  14. ^ a b c Burgess, Matthew G.; Pielke Jr., Roger; Ritchie, Justin (10 October 2022). "Catastrophic climate risks should be neither understated nor overstated" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (42): e2214347119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11914347B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2214347119. PMC 9586302. PMID 36215483.
  15. ^ a b David Wallace-Wells (10 July 2017). "The Uninhabitable Earth". New York. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  16. ^ a b Franzen, Jonathan (8 September 2019). "What if We Stopped Pretending the Climate Apocalypse Can Be Stopped?". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
  17. ^ a b Emmanuel Vincent (12 July 2017). "Scientists explain what New York Magazine article on "The Uninhabitable Earth" gets wrong". Science Feedback. Climate Feedback. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  18. ^ a b Scott Johnson (17 September 2019). "2°C is not known to be a "point of no return", as Jonathan Franzen claims". Science Feedback. Climate Feedback. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  19. ^ a b Hickman, Caroline; Marks, Elizabeth; Pihkala, Panu; Clayton, Susan; Lewandowski, Eric; Mayall, Elouise E; Wray, Britt; Mellor, Catriona; van Susteren, Lise (1 December 2021). "Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey". The Lancet Planetary Health. 5 (12): e863 – e873. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3. PMID 34895496. S2CID 263447086.
  20. ^ a b Spinney, Laura (11 October 2020). "'Humans weren't always here. We could disappear': meet the collapsologists". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  21. ^ Choi, Charles (24 August 2020). "Ancient megadrought may explain civilization's 'missing millennia' in Southeast Asia". Science Magazine. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
  22. ^ "Collapse of civilizations worldwide defines youngest unit of the Geologic Time Scale". News and Meetings. International Commission on Stratigraphy. Retrieved 15 July 2018.
  23. ^ Pillalamarri, Akhilesh (2 June 2016). "Revealed: The Truth Behind the Indus Valley Civilization's 'Collapse'". The Diplomat – The Diplomat is a current-affairs magazine for the Asia-Pacific, with news and analysis on politics, security, business, technology and life across the region. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
  24. ^ National Geographic 2007, pp. 48–49.
  25. ^ Robbins-Schug, G.; Gray, K.M.; Mushrif, V.; Sankhyan, A.R. (November 2012). "A Peaceful Realm? Trauma and Social Differentiation at Harappa" (PDF). International Journal of Paleopathology. 2 (2–3): 136–147. Bibcode:2012IJPal...2..136R. doi:10.1016/j.ijpp.2012.09.012. PMID 29539378. S2CID 3933522.
  26. ^ Robbins-Schug, G.; Blevins, K. Elaine; Cox, Brett; Gray, Kelsey; Mushrif-Tripathy, Veena (December 2013). "Infection, Disease, and Biosocial Process at the End of the Indus Civilization". PLOS ONE. 0084814 (12): e84814. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...884814R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084814. PMC 3866234. PMID 24358372.
  27. ^ Lawler, A. (6 June 2008). "Indus Collapse: The End or the Beginning of an Asian Culture?". Science Magazine. 320 (5881): 1282–1283. doi:10.1126/science.320.5881.1281. PMID 18535222. S2CID 206580637.
  28. ^ Grijalva, K.A.; Kovach, L.R.; Nur, A.M. (1 December 2006). "Evidence for Tectonic Activity During the Mature Harappan Civilization, 2600-1800 BCE". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2006: T51D–1553. Bibcode:2006AGUFM.T51D1553G.
  29. ^ Prasad, Manika; Nur, Amos (1 December 2001). "Tectonic Activity during the Harappan Civilization". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2001: U52B–07. Bibcode:2001AGUFM.U52B..07P.
  30. ^ Kovach, Robert L.; Grijalva, Kelly; Nur, Amos (1 October 2010). Earthquakes and civilizations of the Indus Valley: A challenge for archaeoseismology. Geological Society of America Special Papers. Vol. 471. pp. 119–127. doi:10.1130/2010.2471(11). ISBN 978-0-8137-2471-3.
  31. ^ Zhang, David D.; Lee, Harry F.; Wang, Cong; Li, Baosheng; Pei, Qing; Zhang, Jane; An, Yulun (18 October 2011). "The causality analysis of climate change and large-scale human crisis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (42): 17296–17301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104268108. PMC 3198350. PMID 21969578. S2CID 33451915.
  32. ^ a b Zhang, David D.; Brecke, Peter; Lee, Harry F.; He, Yuan-Qing; Zhang, Jane (4 December 2007). Ehrlich, Paul R. (ed.). "Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (49): 19214–19219. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10419214Z. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703073104. PMC 2148270. PMID 18048343.
  33. ^ Garrard, Greg (2004). Ecocriticism. New York, New York: Routledge. pp. 85–87. ISBN 9780415196925.
  34. ^ Garrard, Greg (2004). Ecocriticism. New York, New York: Routledge. pp. 93–104. ISBN 9780415196925.
  35. ^ Foust, Christina R.; O'Shannon Murphy, William (2009). "Revealing and Reframing Apocalyptic Tragedy in Global Warming Discourse". Environmental Communication. 3 (2): 151–167. Bibcode:2009Ecomm...3..151F. doi:10.1080/17524030902916624. S2CID 144658834.
  36. ^ Lovelock J (16 January 2006). "The Earth is about to catch a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years". The Independent. Archived from the original on 8 April 2006. Retrieved 4 October 2007.
  37. ^ Jeffries S (15 March 2007). "We should be scared stiff". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  38. ^ Aitkenhead D (1 March 2008). "James Lovelock: 'Enjoy life while you can: in 20 years global warming will hit the fan'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  39. ^ Johnston I (23 April 2012). "'Gaia' scientist James Lovelock: I was 'alarmist' about climate change". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 24 April 2012. Retrieved 12 November 2016.
  40. ^ Miller, Laura (26 July 2017). "What Kind of Novel Do You Write When You Believe Civilization Is Doomed?". Slate Magazine. Retrieved 23 May 2020. 'The Uninhabitable Earth,' the most-read story in New York magazine's history
  41. ^ Khanna, Parag (15 August 2022). "What Comes After the Coming Climate Anarchy?". TIME. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  42. ^ Spratt, David; Dunlop, Ian T. (May 2019). "Existential climate-related security risk: A scenario approach". breakthroughonline.org.au. Breakthrough - National Centre for Climate Restoration.
  43. ^ Bendell, Jem (27 July 2018). "Deep adaptation: a map for navigating climate tragedy". Occasional Papers. 2. Ambleside, UK: University of Cumbria: 1–31.
  44. ^ Hunter, Jack (16 March 2020). "The 'climate doomers' preparing for society to fall apart". BBC News. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  45. ^ "'High likelihood of human civilisation coming to end' by 2050, report finds". The Independent. 4 June 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  46. ^ Hollingsworth, Julia (4 June 2019). "Global warming could devastate civilization by 2050: report". CNN. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  47. ^ Ahmed, Nahfeez (22 November 2019). "The Collapse of Civilization May have Already Begun". VICE. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
  48. ^ Best, Shivali (5 June 2019). "Human civilisation 'will collapse by 2050' if we don't tackle climate change". mirror. Retrieved 21 December 2019.
  49. ^ Bromwich, Jonah E. (26 December 2020). "The Darkest Timeline". The New York Times. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
  50. ^ Nicholas, Thomas; Hall, Galen; Schmidt, Colleen (14 July 2020). "The faulty science, doomism, and flawed conclusions of Deep Adaptation". openDemocracy. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
  51. ^ Wallace-Wells, David (26 October 2022). "Beyond Catastrophe: A New Climate Reality Is Coming Into View". New York Times. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  52. ^ Paoletta, Kyle (April 2023). "The Incredible Disappearing Doomsday". Harper's Magazine. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
  53. ^ "Earth is racing toward climate conditions that collapsed key Atlantic currents before the last ice age, study finds". Live Science. 31 October 2024.
  54. ^ Ditlevsen, Peter; Ditlevsen, Susanne (25 July 2023). "Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation". Nature Communications. 14 (1): 4254. arXiv:2304.09160. Bibcode:2023NatCo..14.4254D. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39810-w. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 10368695. PMID 37491344.
  55. ^ "Historic iceberg surges offer insights on modern climate change". The Current. 30 May 2024. Retrieved 30 May 2024.
  56. ^ Cooke, Ben (16 October 2024). "The UK could turn as cold as Scandinavia. Why aren't we preparing?". The Times.
  57. ^ Pare, Sascha (22 October 2024). "Key Atlantic current could collapse soon, 'impacting the entire world for centuries to come,' leading climate scientists warn". Live Science. Retrieved 31 October 2024.
  58. ^ "expert reaction to paper warning of a collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation". Science Media Centre. 25 July 2023. Retrieved 11 August 2023.
  59. ^ "Top climate scientists are sceptical that nations will rein in global warming". Nature. 1 November 2021. Archived from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
  60. ^ Bradshaw, Corey J. A.; Ehrlich, Paul R.; Beattie, Andrew; Ceballos, Gerardo; Crist, Eileen; Diamond, Joan; Dirzo, Rodolfo; Ehrlich, Anne H.; Harte, John; Harte, Mary Ellen; Pyke, Graham; Raven, Peter H.; Ripple, William J.; Saltré, Frédérik; Turnbull, Christine; Wackernagel, Mathis; Blumstein, Daniel T. (2021). "Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future". Frontiers in Conservation Science. 1. Bibcode:2021FrCS....1.5419B. doi:10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419.
  61. ^ Weston, Phoebe (13 January 2021). "Top Scientists Warn of 'Ghastly Future of Mass Extinction' and Climate Disruption". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 February 2021.
  62. ^ Pentin, Edward (19 June 2015). "German Climatologist Refutes Claims He Promotes Population Control". National Catholic Register. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  63. ^ Adedokun, Naomi (19 October 2019). "Andrew Neil dismantles Extinction Rebellion's claim that 'billions of children would die'". Daily Express. Retrieved 20 January 2023.
  64. ^ Ahmed, Nafeez (26 May 2022). "UN Warns of 'Total Societal Collapse' Due to Breaching of Planetary Boundaries". United Nations. Byline times. Retrieved 15 November 2024.
  65. ^ Kraus, Tina; Lee, Ian (3 August 2022). "Scientists say the world needs to think about a worst-case "climate endgame"". CBS News. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
  66. ^ Steel, Daniel; DesRoches, C. Tyler; Mintz-Woo, Kian (6 October 2022). "Climate change and the threat to civilization". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (42): e2210525119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11910525S. doi:10.1073/pnas.2210525119. hdl:10468/13756. PMC 9586259. PMID 36201599.
  67. ^ Kelman, Ilan (10 October 2022). "Connecting disciplines and decades" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (42): e2213953119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11913953K. doi:10.1073/pnas.2213953119. PMC 9586291. PMID 36215476.
  68. ^ Bhowmik, Avit; McCaffrey, Mark S.; Roon Varga, Juliette (2 November 2022). "From Climate Endgame to Climate Long Game". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (45): e2214975119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11914975B. doi:10.1073/pnas.2214975119. PMC 9659379. PMID 36322727.
  69. ^ Ruhl, J. B.; Craig, Robin Kundis (29 November 2022). "Designing extreme climate change scenarios for anticipatory governance". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (49): e2216155119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11916155R. doi:10.1073/pnas.2216155119. PMC 9894176. PMID 36445959.
  70. ^ Kemp, Luke; Xu, Chi; Depledge, Joanna; Ebi, Kristie L.; Gibbins, Goodwin; Kohler, Timothy A.; Rockstr?m, Johan; Scheffer, Marten; Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim; Steffen, Will; Lenton, Timothy M. (10 October 2022). "Reply to Burgess et al: Catastrophic climate risks are neglected, plausible, and safe to study". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (42): e2214884119. Bibcode:2022PNAS..11914884K. doi:10.1073/pnas.2214884119. PMC 9586271. PMID 36215481.
  71. ^ Peake, Eleanor (25 September 2023). "I'm a climate scientist and I think society will collapse by 2050. Here's how I'm preparing". I news. Retrieved 13 November 2024.
  72. ^ "MIT Predicted in 1972 That Society Will Collapse This Century. New Research Shows We're on Schedule". Environment Institute. Yale Journal of Industrial Ecology. 14 July 2023. Retrieved 13 November 2024.

Works cited

[edit]
反流性胃炎吃什么药 手脚浮肿是什么原因引起的 性功能减退吃什么药 红豆和什么一起煮比较好 肾结石都有什么症状
眼镜轴向是什么意思 世界上最大的数是什么 脸肿是什么原因 6岁属什么生肖 星盘是什么
女性腰疼应该挂什么科 66大寿有什么讲究 高密度脂蛋白胆固醇低是什么意思 湿疹是因为什么原因引起的 读警校需要什么条件
梦见打官司预示着什么 拘禁是什么意思 膀胱癌早期是什么症状 一年一片避孕药叫什么 尿里面有血是什么原因
为什么长口腔溃疡hcv9jop7ns3r.cn 思维跳脱是什么意思hcv8jop9ns6r.cn 6月1是什么星座0735v.com 出色的什么hcv8jop8ns3r.cn 牛头马面是什么生肖hcv8jop3ns0r.cn
胸部胀疼是什么原因hcv8jop0ns4r.cn 尿酸偏高是什么原因hcv8jop2ns0r.cn 人的五官指什么adwl56.com 今年春节是什么时候hcv9jop0ns2r.cn soe咖啡是什么意思hcv7jop5ns4r.cn
杜甫被人们称为什么hcv9jop0ns6r.cn 绿树成荫是什么季节xinjiangjialails.com 91年属什么的hcv9jop7ns2r.cn 自来水养鱼为什么会死xianpinbao.com 晚上难入睡是什么原因cj623037.com
圣诞节是什么时候shenchushe.com 么么叽是什么意思hcv9jop6ns4r.cn 不放屁是什么原因hcv8jop0ns1r.cn 七夕是什么意思hcv8jop5ns3r.cn 什么人从来不看医生hcv8jop3ns6r.cn
百度