胸腔积液挂什么科| 睡觉时胳膊和手发麻是什么原因| 中元节是什么意思| 背德感是什么意思| 广菜是什么菜| 坯子是什么意思| 胃不好吃什么| 狗牯脑茶属于什么茶| 骑马挥杆是什么牌子| 四川芽菜是什么菜| 如履薄冰什么意思| 轶是什么意思| 小马拉大车什么意思| 小狗喜欢吃什么| 十三点是什么意思| 人过留名雁过留声什么意思| 无量寿佛是什么意思| 透析是什么原理| 交际花是什么意思| 是谁在敲打我窗是什么歌| 喝山楂水有什么好处| 智是什么意思| 内能与什么因素有关| 头七需要做什么| 合疗和医保有什么区别| 三生三世是什么意思| 小说be是什么意思| 子宫内膜9mm意味着什么| 龙胆是什么| ib是什么单位| 长命百岁是什么意思| 强硬是什么意思| 万圣节为什么要送糖果| 外阴白斑用什么药| 耐克是什么牌子| 晕车药什么时候吃最好| 打感情牌是什么意思| 火把节是什么节日| 低回声是什么意思| 小知了叫什么| 脂肪的克星是什么| 厌世是什么意思| 恳谈会是什么意思| 再者是什么意思| 献殷勤是什么意思| 茄子与什么相克| 璨字五行属什么| 凉茶是什么茶| rad是什么意思| 头响脑鸣是什么原因引起的| 三月是什么季节| 淮山跟山药有什么区别| 在吗是什么意思| 巴西货币叫什么| 吃什么发胖最快| 什么是理数| 什么是干眼症| 三个手念什么| 49年属什么生肖| 精神焦虑症有什么表现有哪些| 鹤是什么生肖| 什么的梦| 牙齿黄是什么原因| 虎口是什么穴位| 黄芪和什么搭配不上火| 惊涛骇浪是什么意思| 纷扰是什么意思| 政绩是什么意思| 当局是什么意思| 为什么会得糖尿病| ro是什么意思| 脑萎缩是什么原因| 湿气重能吃什么水果| 羞明畏光是什么意思| 男人为什么喜欢大胸| 尽善尽美是什么生肖| 梦到水是什么意思| 阁五行属什么| 脂溢性皮炎用什么药| 洋葱不能和什么食物一起吃| 舌头疼挂什么科| 急性尿道炎吃什么药| 手莫名其妙的肿了因为什么| 壁虎吃什么食物| 涉三什么意思| 通宵是什么意思| 新生儿吐奶什么原因| 斛是什么意思| 壁虎为什么是五毒之一| 梦见西红柿什么意思| 备孕去医院挂什么科| 空谷幽兰下一句是什么| 吃什么改善睡眠| 摔伤挂什么科| 屁多吃什么药| 甲状腺有什么危害| 血红蛋白偏高是什么原因| 刘彻是刘邦的什么人| 西柚是什么水果| 血糖高是什么原因造成的| 手机合约版是什么意思| 经常打嗝是什么原因| 爱豆是什么| 直肠肿物是什么意思| 尼泊尔人是什么人种| 孙红雷的老婆叫什么名字| 肌酐高是什么意思| 8.19是什么星座| 男人毛发旺盛说明什么| 白灼虾是什么虾| 天使长什么样| 脑梗有什么症状| 大力丸是什么| 香菇和什么不能一起吃| 三文鱼有什么营养| 荼靡是什么意思| 撒旦和路西法什么关系| 什么是角| 急性尿道炎吃什么药| 汗蒸有什么好处和功效| 胃寒吃什么食物好| 梦见自己给自己剪头发是什么意思| canon是什么意思| 红薯叶不能和什么一起吃| 不能吃辣是什么原因| 欲哭无泪什么意思| 为什么同房后小腹疼痛| 裸睡是什么意思| 失眠多梦挂什么科| 83年属什么| 陨石有什么作用和功效| 喝什么茶| 肺结核是什么原因引起的| 杨梅用什么酒泡最好| 什么山什么水| 为什么手会掉皮| 抠鼻表情什么意思| 更年期补钙吃什么钙片好| 空调病是什么症状| 大满贯什么意思| 重塑是什么意思| 肚脐左下方疼是什么原因| 疝囊是什么| 媚字五行属什么| 立冬和冬至什么区别| 重症肌无力是什么原因引起的| 激素六项挂什么科| 或缺是什么意思| 什么是意淫| 跑步有什么好处| 阿苯达唑片是什么药| 什么忙什么乱| 外传是什么意思| 身上肉疼是什么原因| 全职是什么意思| 攒劲是什么意思| 肋骨断了是什么感觉| 牛大力和什么泡酒壮阳| 眼睛过敏用什么眼药水| 壮阳吃什么补最快最好| 什么情况下要做肠镜检查| 坐车晕车是什么原因| 慢性萎缩性胃炎吃什么食物好| 肛门下坠是什么原因| 黄精是什么| 醉氧是什么意思| 静脉曲张是什么引起的| 榴莲什么季节吃最好| 肩胛骨痛是什么原因| 什么时辰出生最好| 痛风是什么地方痛| 精子发黄是什么原因| 泌尿内科主要看什么病| 2008年什么年| 阳字属于五行属什么| 经期吃什么食物比较好| 心烦意乱焦躁不安吃什么药| 朋字五行属什么| 繁衍的衍是什么意思| 什么人不适合喝骆驼奶| 吃什么可以增加免疫力| 春眠不觉晓的晓是什么意思| 胎盘粘连是什么原因造成的| 为什么一热身上就痒| 脚面疼是什么原因引起的| 白萝卜不能和什么一起吃| 宥怎么读什么意思| 胃造影和胃镜有什么区别| 开髓引流是什么| 新生儿什么时候剪头发| 湿气是什么原因造成的| 什么时候开始数伏| 嗓子疼喝什么药| 生殖细胞瘤是什么病| 十二年是什么婚| 镶牙用什么材料好| 牵牛花什么时候开花| 咖啡和什么不能一起吃| 下体瘙痒是什么原因| 音高是什么意思| 经常性偏头疼是什么原因| 龙虾的血是什么颜色的| 秉字五行属什么| 盐酸盐是什么| 便潜血阳性什么意思| 阴道有异味买什么药| 中科院是干什么的| 1958年属狗的是什么命| 经常想睡觉是什么原因| 梦见好多猪肉是什么意思| 紫癜有什么危害| 水溶性是什么意思| 喜字五行属什么| 中途疲软吃什么药| 美国为什么不敢打朝鲜| 重返20岁韩国版叫什么| 女性睾酮高意味着什么| 窒息是什么意思| 下饭菜都有什么菜| 长期喝枸杞水有什么好处和坏处| 梦见牛顶我是什么意思| 白色裤子搭什么颜色上衣| pda是什么意思| aape是什么牌子| 向心性肥胖是什么意思| 结甲是什么病| 泥鳅不能和什么一起吃| 三亚免税店什么最便宜| 大大是什么意思| 妇检tct是什么检查| 喝什么茶叶减肥效果最好| zoe是什么意思| 霸王龙吃什么| 属狗的什么命| 距骨在什么位置| 西南方向是什么方位| 黑头发有什么好处脑筋急转弯| 烤肉筋的肉是什么肉| 男生小便尿道刺痛什么原因| 吃什么大补| 毛囊炎挂什么科| 龟头瘙痒用什么药膏| 左后背疼是什么原因| 66什么意思| 凌志和雷克萨斯有什么区别| 十年什么婚| 小舌头叫什么| 红豆为什么代表相思| 什么是av| 胆汁反流吃什么药最好| 虎的本命佛是什么佛| 香客是什么意思| 心机什么意思| 高泌乳素血症是什么原因引起的| 血热是什么症状| 王母娘娘叫什么名字| 睡前吃什么有助于睡眠| 月经咖啡色是什么原因| ABB式的词语有什么| 胸部爱出汗是什么原因| 女人为什么会喷水| 舌头不舒服挂什么科| 武夷肉桂茶属于什么茶| 肺气肿用什么药效果好| 百度Jump to content

青海通报2017年全省妇女健康状况 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Individuals in groups are connected to each other by social relationships.

In the social sciences, a social group is defined as two or more people who interact with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity.[1][2] Regardless, social groups come in a myriad of sizes and varieties. For example, a society can be viewed as a large social group. The system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group or between social groups is known as group dynamics.

Definition

[edit]

Social cohesion approach

[edit]

A social group exhibits some degree of social cohesion and is more than a simple collection or aggregate of individuals, such as people waiting at a bus stop, or people waiting in a line. Characteristics shared by members of a group may include interests, values, representations, ethnic or social background, and kinship ties. Kinship ties being a social bond based on common ancestry, marriage or adoption.[3] In a similar vein, some researchers consider the defining characteristic of a group as social interaction.[4] According to Dunbar's number, on average, people cannot maintain stable social relationships with more than 150 individuals.[5]

Social psychologist Muzafer Sherif proposed to define a social unit as a number of individuals interacting with each other with respect to:[6]

  1. Common motives and goals
  2. An accepted division of labor, i.e. roles
  3. Established status (social rank, dominance) relationships
  4. Accepted norms and values with reference to matters relevant to the group
  5. Development of accepted sanctions (praise and punishment) if and when norms were respected or violated

This definition succeeds in providing the researcher with the tools required to answer three important questions:

  1. "How is a group formed?"
  2. "How does a group function?"
  3. "How does one describe those social interactions that occur on the way to forming a group?"

Significance of that definition

[edit]

The attention of those who use, participate in, or study groups has focused on functioning groups, on larger organizations, or on the decisions made in these organizations.[7] Much less attention has been paid to the more ubiquitous and universal social behaviors that do not clearly demonstrate one or more of the five necessary elements described by Sherif.

Some of the earliest efforts to understand these social units have been the extensive descriptions of urban street gangs in the 1920s and 1930s, continuing through the 1950s, which understood them to be largely reactions to the established authority.[8] The primary goal of gang members was to defend gang territory, and to define and maintain the dominance structure within the gang. There remains in the popular media and urban law enforcement agencies an avid interest in gangs, reflected in daily headlines which emphasize the criminal aspects of gang behavior. However, these studies and the continued interest have not improved the capacity to influence gang behavior or to reduce gang related violence.

The relevant literature on animal social behaviors, such as work on territory and dominance, has been available since the 1950s. Also, they have been largely neglected by policy makers, sociologists and anthropologists. Indeed, vast literature on organization, property, law enforcement, ownership, religion, warfare, values, conflict resolution, authority, rights, and families have grown and evolved without any reference to any analogous social behaviors in animals. This disconnect may be the result of the belief that social behavior in humankind is radically different from the social behavior in animals because of the human capacity for language use and rationality. Of course, while this is true, it is equally likely that the study of the social (group) behaviors of other animals might shed light on the evolutionary roots of social behavior in people.

Territorial and dominance behaviors in humans are so universal and commonplace that they are simply taken for granted (though sometimes admired, as in home ownership, or deplored, as in violence). But these social behaviors and interactions between human individuals play a special role in the study of groups: they are necessarily prior to the formation of groups.[citation needed] The psychological internalization of territorial and dominance experiences in conscious and unconscious memory are established through the formation of social identity, personal identity, body concept, or self concept. An adequately functioning individual identity is necessary before an individual can function in a division of labor (role), and hence, within a cohesive group. Coming to understand territorial and dominance behaviors may thus help to clarify the development, functioning, and productivity of groups.

Social identification approach

[edit]

Explicitly contrasted against a social cohesion based definition for social groups is the social identity perspective, which draws on insights made in social identity theory.[9] Here, rather than defining a social group based on expressions of cohesive social relationships between individuals, the social identity model assumes that "psychological group membership has primarily a perceptual or cognitive basis."[10] It posits that the necessary and sufficient condition for individuals to act as group members is "awareness of a common category membership" and that a social group can be "usefully conceptualized as a number of individuals who have internalized the same social category membership as a component of their self concept."[10] Stated otherwise, while the social cohesion approach expects group members to ask "who am I attracted to?", the social identity perspective expects group members to simply ask "who am I?"

Empirical support for the social identity perspective on groups was initially drawn from work using the minimal group paradigm. For example, it has been shown that the mere act of allocating individuals to explicitly random categories is sufficient to lead individuals to act in an ingroup favouring fashion (even where no individual self-interest is possible).[11] Also problematic for the social cohesion account is recent research showing that seemingly meaningless categorization can be an antecedent of perceptions of interdependence with fellow category members.[12]

While the roots of this approach to social groups had its foundations in social identity theory, more concerted exploration of these ideas occurred later in the form of self-categorization theory.[13] Whereas social identity theory was directed initially at the explanation of intergroup conflict in the absence of any conflict of interests, self-categorization theory was developed to explain how individuals come to perceive themselves as members of a group in the first place, and how this self-grouping process underlies and determines all problems subsequent aspects of group behaviour.[14]

Defining characteristics

[edit]

In his text, Group Dynamics, Forsyth (2010) discuses several common characteristics of groups that can help to define them.[15]

Interaction

[edit]

This group component varies greatly, including verbal or non-verbal communication, social loafing, networking, forming bonds, etc. Research by Bales (cite, 1950, 1999) determine that there are two main types of interactions; relationship interactions and task interactions.

  1. Relationship interactions: "actions performed by group members that relate to or influence the emotional and interpersonal bonds within the group, including both positive actions (social support, consideration) and negative actions (criticism, conflict)."[15]
  2. Task interactions: "actions performed by group members that pertain to the group's projects, tasks, and goals."[15] This involve members organizing themselves and utilizing their skills and resources to achieve something.

Goals

[edit]

Most groups have a reason for their existence, be it increasing the education and knowledge, receiving emotional support, or experiencing spirituality or religion. Groups can facilitate the achievement of these goals.[15] The circumplex model of group tasks by Joseph McGrath[16] organizes group related tasks and goals. Groups may focus on several of these goals, or one area at a time. The model divides group goals into four main types, which are further sub-categorized

  1. Generating: coming up with ideas and plans to reach goals
    • Planning Tasks
    • Creativity Tasks
  2. Choosing: Selecting a solution.
    • Intellective Tasks
    • Decision-making Tasks
  3. Negotiating: Arranging a solution to a problem.
    • Cognitive Conflict Tasks
    • Mixed Motive Task
  4. Executing: Act of carrying out a task.
    • Contests/Battles/Competitive Tasks
    • Performance/Psychomotor Tasks

Interdependence in relation

[edit]

“The state of being dependent, to some degree, on other people, as when one's outcomes, actions, thoughts, feelings, and experiences are determined in whole or part by others."[15] Some groups are more interdependent than others. For example, a sports team would have a relatively high level of interdependence as compared to a group of people watching a movie at the movie theater. Also, interdependence may be mutual (flowing back and forth between members) or more linear/unilateral. For example, some group members may be more dependent on their boss than the boss is on each of the individuals.

Structure

[edit]

Group structure involves the emergence or regularities, norms, roles and relations that form within a group over time. Roles involve the expected performance and conduct of people within the group depending on their status or position within the group. Norms are the ideas adopted by the group pertaining to acceptable and unacceptable conduct by members. Group structure is a very important part of a group. If people fail to meet their expectations within to groups, and fulfil their roles, they may not accept the group, or be accepted by other group members.

Unity

[edit]

When viewed holistically, a group is greater than the sum of its individual parts. When people speak of groups, they speak of the group as a whole, or an entity, rather than speaking of it in terms of individuals. For example, it would be said that "The band played beautifully." Several factors play a part in this image of unity, including group cohesiveness, and entitativity (appearance of cohesion by outsiders).[15]

Types

[edit]

Donelson R. Forsyth distinguishes four main types of groups: primary groups, social groups, collectives, and categories.[17][page needed]

Primary groups

[edit]

Primary groups[17] are small, long-term groups characterized by high amounts of cohesiveness, of member-identification, of face-to-face interaction, and of solidarity. Such groups may act as the principal source of socialization for individuals as primary groups may shape an individual's attitudes, values, and social orientation.

Three sub-groups of primary groups are:[18]

  1. kin (relatives)
  2. close friends
  3. neighbours

Social groups

[edit]

Social groups[17] are also small groups but are of moderate duration. These groups often form due to a common goal. In this type of group, it is possible for outgroup members (i.e., social categories of which one is not a member)[19] to become ingroup members (i.e., social categories of which one is a member)[19] with reasonable ease. Social groups, such as study-groups or coworkers, interact moderately over a prolonged period of time.

Collectives

[edit]

In contrast, spontaneous collectives,[17] such as bystanders or audiences of various sizes, exist only for a very brief period of time and it is very easy to become an ingroup member from an outgroup member and vice versa. Collectives may display similar actions and outlooks.

Categories

[edit]

Categories[17] consist of individuals that are similar to one another in a certain way; members of this group can be permanent ingroup members or temporary ingroup members. Examples of categories include groups with the same ethnicity, gender, religion, or nationality. This group is generally the largest type of group.

Health

[edit]

The social groups people are involved with in the workplace directly affect their health. No matter where they work or what the occupation is, feeling a sense of belonging in a peer group is a key to overall success.[20] Part of this is the responsibility of the leader (manager, supervisor, etc.). If the leader helps everyone feel a sense of belonging within the group, it can help boost morale and productivity. According to Dr. Niklas Steffens "Social identification contributes to both psychological and physiological health, but the health benefits are stronger for psychological health".[21] The social relationships people have can be linked to different health conditions. Lower quantity or quality social relationships have been connected to issues such as: development of cardiovascular disease, recurrent myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, autonomic dysregulation, high blood pressure, cancer and delayed cancer recovery, and slower wound healing as well as inflammatory biomarkers and impaired immune function, factors associated with adverse health outcomes and mortality. The social relationship of marriage is the most studied of all, the marital history over the course of one's life can form differing health outcomes such as cardiovascular disease, chronic conditions, mobility limitations, self-rated health, and depressive symptoms. Social connectedness also plays a large part in overcoming certain conditions such as drug, alcohol, or substance abuse. With these types of issues, a person's peer group play a big role in helping them stay sober. Conditions do not need to be life-threatening, one's social group can help deal with work anxiety as well. When people are more socially connected have access to more support.[22] Some of the health issues people have may also stem from their uncertainty about just where they stand among their colleagues. It has been shown that being well socially connected has a significant impact on a person as they age, according to a 10-year study by the MacArthur Foundation, which was published in the book 'Successful Aging'[23] the support, love, and care we feel through our social connections can help to counteract some of the health-related negatives of aging. Older people who were more active in social circles tended to be better off health-wise.[24]

Group membership and recruitment

[edit]

Social groups tend to form based on certain principles of attraction, that draw individuals to affiliate with each other, eventually forming a group.

  • The Proximity Principle – the tendency for individuals to develop relationships and form groups with those they are (often physically) close to. This is often referred to as ‘familiarity breeds liking’, or that we prefer things/people that we are familiar with [25]
  • The Similarity Principle – the tendency for individuals to affiliate with or prefer individuals who share their attitudes, values, demographic characteristics, etc.
  • The Complementarity Principle – the tendency for individuals to like other individuals who are dissimilar from themselves, but in a complementary manner. E.g. leaders will attract those who like being led, and those who like being led will attract leaders [26]
  • The Reciprocity Principle – the tendency for liking to be mutual. For example, if A likes B, B is inclined to like A. Conversely, if A dislikes B, B will probably not like A (negative reciprocity)
  • The Elaboration Principle – the tendency for groups to complexify over time by adding new members through their relationships with existing group members. In more formal or structured groups, prospective members may need a reference from a current group member before they can join.

Other factors also influence the formation of a group. Extroverts may seek out groups more, as they find larger and more frequent interpersonal interactions stimulating and enjoyable (more than introverts). Similarly, groups may seek out extroverts more than introverts, perhaps because they find they connect with extroverts more readily.[27] Those higher in relationality (attentiveness to their relations with other people) are also likelier to seek out and prize group membership. Relationality has also been associated with extroversion and agreeableness.[28] Similarly, those with a high need for affiliation are more drawn to join groups, spend more time with groups and accept other group members more readily.[29]

Previous experiences with groups (good and bad) inform people's decisions to join prospective groups. Individuals will compare the rewards of the group (e.g. belonging,[30] emotional support,[31] informational support, instrumental support, spiritual support; see Uchino, 2004 for an overview) against potential costs (e.g. time, emotional energy). Those with negative or 'mixed' experiences with previous groups will likely be more deliberate in their assessment of potential groups to join, and with which groups they choose to join. (For more, see Minimax Principal, as part of Social Exchange Theory)

Once a group has begun to form, it can increase membership through a few ways. If the group is an open group,[32] where membership boundaries are relatively permeable, group members can enter and leave the group as they see fit (often via at least one of the aforementioned Principles of Attraction). A closed group [32] on the other hand, where membership boundaries are more rigid and closed, often engages in deliberate and/or explicit recruitment and socialization of new members.

If a group is highly cohesive, it will likely engage in processes that contribute to cohesion levels, especially when recruiting new members, who can add to a group's cohesion, or destabilize it. Classic examples of groups with high cohesion are fraternities, sororities, gangs, and cults, which are all noted for their recruitment process, especially their initiation or hazing. In all groups, formal and informal initiations add to a group's cohesion and strengthens the bond between the individual and group by demonstrating the exclusiveness of group membership as well as the recruit's dedication to the group.[15] Initiations tend to be more formal in more cohesive groups. Initiation is also important for recruitment because it can mitigate any cognitive dissonance in potential group members.[33]

In some instances, such as cults, recruitment can also be referred to as conversion. Kelman's Theory of Conversion[34] identifies 3 stages of conversion: compliance (individual will comply or accept group's views, but not necessarily agree with them), identification (member begins to mimic group's actions, values, characteristics, etc.) and internalization (group beliefs and demands become congruent with member's personal beliefs, goals and values). This outlines the process of how new members can become deeply connected to the group.

Development

[edit]

If one brings a small collection of strangers together in a restricted space and environment, provides a common goal and maybe a few ground rules, then a highly probable course of events will follow. Interaction between individuals is the basic requirement. At first, individuals will differentially interact in sets of twos or threes while seeking to interact with those with whom they share something in common: i.e., interests, skills, and cultural background. Relationships will develop some stability in these small sets, in that individuals may temporarily change from one set to another, but will return to the same pairs or trios rather consistently and resist change. Particular twosomes and threesomes will stake out their special spots within the overall space.

Again depending on the common goal, eventually twosomes and threesomes will integrate into larger sets of six or eight, with corresponding revisions of territory, dominance-ranking, and further differentiation of roles. All of this seldom takes place without some conflict or disagreement: for example, fighting over the distribution of resources, the choices of means and different subgoals, the development of what are appropriate norms, rewards and punishments. Some of these conflicts will be territorial in nature: i.e., jealousy over roles, or locations, or favored relationships. But most will be involved with struggles for status, ranging from mild protests to serious verbal conflicts and even dangerous violence.

By analogy to animal behavior, sociologists may term these behaviors territorial behaviors and dominance behaviors. Depending on the pressure of the common goal and on the various skills of individuals, differentiations of leadership, dominance, or authority will develop. Once these relationships solidify, with their defined roles, norms, and sanctions, a productive group will have been established.[35][36][37]

Aggression is the mark of unsettled dominance order. Productive group cooperation requires that both dominance order and territorial arrangements (identity, self-concept) be settled with respect to the common goal and within the particular group. Some individuals may withdraw from interaction or be excluded from the developing group. Depending on the number of individuals in the original collection of strangers, and the number of "hangers-on" that are tolerated, one or more competing groups of ten or less may form, and the competition for territory and dominance will then also be manifested in the inter group transactions.

Dispersal and transformation

[edit]

Two or more people in interacting situations will over time develop stable territorial relationships. As described above, these may or may not develop into groups. But stable groups can also break up in to several sets of territorial relationships. There are numerous reasons for stable groups to "malfunction" or to disperse, but essentially this is because of loss of compliance with one or more elements of the definition of group provided by Sherif[citation needed]. The two most common causes of a malfunctioning group are the addition of too many individuals, and the failure of the leader to enforce a common purpose, though malfunctions may occur due to a failure of any of the other elements (i.e., confusions status or of norms).

In a society, there is a need for more people to participate in cooperative endeavors than can be accommodated by a few separate groups.[citation needed] The military has been the best example as to how this is done in its hierarchical array of squads, platoons, companies, battalions, regiments, and divisions. Private companies, corporations, government agencies, clubs, and so on have all developed comparable (if less formal and standardized) systems when the number of members or employees exceeds the number that can be accommodated in an effective group. Not all larger social structures require the cohesion that may be found in the small group. Consider the neighborhood, the country club, or the megachurch, which are basically territorial organizations who support large social purposes. Any such large organizations may need only islands of cohesive leadership.

For a functioning group to attempt to add new members in a casual way is a certain prescription for failure, loss of efficiency, or disorganization. The number of functioning members in a group can be reasonably flexible between five and ten, and a long-standing cohesive group may be able to tolerate a few hangers on. The key concept is that the value and success of a group is obtained by each member maintaining a distinct, functioning identity in the minds of each of the members. The cognitive limit to this span of attention in individuals is often set at seven. Rapid shifting of attention can push the limit to about ten. After ten, subgroups will inevitably start to form with the attendant loss of purpose, dominance-order, and individuality, with confusion of roles and rules. The standard classroom with twenty to forty pupils and one teacher offers a rueful example of one supposed leader juggling a number of subgroups.

Weakening of the common purpose once a group is well established can be attributed to: adding new members; unsettled conflicts of identities (i.e., territorial problems in individuals); weakening of a settled dominance-order; and weakening or failure of the leader to tend to the group. The actual loss of a leader is frequently fatal to a group, unless there was lengthy preparation for the transition. The loss of the leader tends to dissolve all dominance relationships, as well as weakening dedication to common purpose, differentiation of roles, and maintenance of norms. The most common symptoms of a troubled group are loss of efficiency, diminished participation, or weakening of purpose, as well as an increase in verbal aggression. Often, if a strong common purpose is still present, a simple reorganization with a new leader and a few new members will be sufficient to re-establish the group, which is somewhat easier than forming an entirely new group. This is the most common factor.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Reicher, S. D. (1982). "The determination of collective behaviour." pp. 41–83 in H. Tajfel (ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.[ISBN missing]
  2. ^ Flamino, James; Szymanski, Boleslaw K.; Bahulkar, Ashwin; Chan, Kevin; Lizardo, Omar (2021). "Creation, evolution, and dissolution of social groups". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 17470. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1117470F. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96805-7. PMC 8410948. PMID 34471167.
  3. ^ Macionis, John; Gerber, Linda (2010). Sociology (7th Canadian ed.). Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc.
  4. ^ Hare, A. P. (1962). Handbook of small group research. New York: Macmillan Publishers.
  5. ^ Gladwell 2002, pp. 177–181.
  6. ^ Sherif, Muzafer, and Carolyn W. Sherif, An Outline of Social Psychology (rev. ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers. pp. 143–180.
  7. ^ Simon, Herbert A. 1976. Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.). New York. Free Press. pp. 123–153.
  8. ^ Sherif, op. cit. p. 149.
  9. ^ Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. pp. 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
  10. ^ a b Turner, J.C. (1982). Tajfel, H. (ed.). "Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group". Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 15–40.
  11. ^ Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R.P. & Flament, C. (1971). "Social categorization and intergroup behaviour". European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 149–178,
  12. ^ Platow, M.J.; Grace, D.M.; Smithson, M.J. (2011). "Examining the Preconditions for Psychological Group Membership: Perceived Social Interdependence as the Outcome of Self-Categorization". Social Psychological and Personality Science. 3 (1).
  13. ^ Turner, J.C.; Reynolds, K.H. (2001). Brown, R.; Gaertner, S.L. (eds.). "The Social Identity Perspective in Intergroup Relations: Theories, Themes, and Controversies". Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology. 3 (1).
  14. ^ Turner, J. C. (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 42–67.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g Forsyth, Donelson R. (2010). Group Dynamics (5 ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  16. ^ McGrath, Joseph, E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp. 61–62.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b c d e Forsyth, Donelson R. 2009. Group Dynamics (5th ed.). New York: Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0495599524.
  18. ^ Litwak, Eugene, and Ivan Szelenyi. 1969. "Primary Group Structures and Their Functions: Kin, Neighbors, and Friends." American Sociological Review 34(4):465–481. doi:10.2307/2091957. – via ResearchGate.
  19. ^ a b Quattrone, G.A.; Jones, E.E. (1980). "The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 38 (1): 142. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.141.
  20. ^ "Health determined by social relationships at work". phys.org. Society for Personality and Social Psychology. Archived from the original on 2025-08-05.
  21. ^ "Workplace leaders improve employee wellbeing". phys.org. University of Queensland. Archived from the original on 2025-08-05.
  22. ^ Debra Umberson; Karas Montez, Jennifer (2010). "Social Relationships and Health: A Flashpoint for Health Policy". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 51 (Suppl): S54 – S66. doi:10.1177/0022146510383501. PMC 3150158. PMID 20943583.
  23. ^ Rowe, J.W.; Kahn, R.L. (1997). "Successful Aging". The Gerontologist. 37 (4): 433–440. doi:10.1093/geront/37.4.433. PMID 9279031.
  24. ^ Staackmann, Mary. "Social Connections are a Key to Aging Well". Chicago Tribune. The Evanston Review. Archived from the original on 2025-08-05.
  25. ^ Bornstein, Robert F. (1989). "Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968, 1987". Psychological Bulletin. 106 (2): 265–289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265.
  26. ^ Tracey, Terence, Ryan, Jennifer M., Jaschik-Herman, Bruce (2001). "Complementarity of interpersonal circumplex traits". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 27 (7): 786–797. doi:10.1177/0146167201277002. S2CID 144304609.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ Gardner, William L., Reithel, Brian J., Cogliser, Claudia C., Walumbwa, Fred O., Foley, Richard T. (2012). "Matching personality and organizational culture effects of recruitment strategy and the five-factor model on subjective person-organization fit". Management Communication Quarterly. 24: 585–622. doi:10.1177/0893318912450663. S2CID 146744551.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., Morris, M. L. (2000). "The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78 (4): 791–808. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.191. PMID 10794381.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. ^ McAdams, Dan P., Constantian, Carol A. (1983). "Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience in sampling analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45 (4): 851–861. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.851.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ Kruase, Neal, Wulff, Keith M. (2005). "Church-based social ties, a sense of belonging in a congregation, and physical health status". International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 15: 75–93.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ McGuire, Gail M. (2007). "Intimate work: A typology of the social support that workers provide to their network members". Work and Occupations. 34: 125–147. doi:10.1177/0730888406297313. S2CID 145394891.
  32. ^ a b Ziller, R. C. (1965). "Toward a theory of open and closed groups". Psychological Bulletin. 34 (3): 164–182. doi:10.1037/h0022390. PMID 14343396.
  33. ^ Aronson, E., Mills, J. (1959). "The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 59 (2): 177–181. doi:10.1037/h0047195.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Kelman, H. (1958). "Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change". Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2: 51–60. doi:10.1177/002200275800200106. S2CID 145642577.
  35. ^ Sherif, op. cit. pp. 181–279
  36. ^ Scott, John Paul. Animal Behavior, The University of Chicago Press, 1959, 281 pp.[ISBN missing]
  37. ^ Halloway, Ralph L., Primate Aggression, Territoriality, and Xenophobia, Academic Press: New York, and London 1974. 496 pp.[ISBN missing]
[edit]
经典是什么意思 一什么十什么的成语 什么叫蓝牙 网络诈骗打什么电话 w是什么意思
糜米是什么米 送人梳子的寓意是什么 早孕试纸什么时候测最准确 什么人适合吃蛋白质粉 犒赏是什么意思
摔纹皮是什么皮 宝宝感冒吃什么药 心里不舒服是什么原因 面面俱到是什么意思 夏天喝什么好
褒义词什么意思 瞌睡多什么原因 耳根子软是什么意思 尿颜色很黄是什么原因 中医四诊指的是什么
咽喉老有痰是什么原因hcv8jop4ns9r.cn 勾股定理是什么意思hcv8jop9ns8r.cn 麻子是什么意思hcv8jop5ns2r.cn 干咳吃什么药好的快hcv8jop6ns0r.cn 时过境迁是什么意思hcv9jop4ns6r.cn
属兔配什么属相最好beikeqingting.com 维生素b吃多了有什么副作用hcv9jop5ns3r.cn 补气血吃什么最好最快hcv9jop6ns2r.cn 胃息肉吃什么好clwhiglsz.com 脸过敏要注意什么hcv8jop8ns1r.cn
鱼饼是什么做的hcv7jop6ns2r.cn 费神是什么意思hcv9jop5ns5r.cn 脚板痛是什么原因hcv9jop8ns1r.cn 女人是什么动物hcv8jop8ns2r.cn 幽门螺杆菌吃什么药好hcv8jop4ns0r.cn
阴虚火旺吃什么药hcv9jop8ns0r.cn 窦性心律是什么hcv9jop7ns2r.cn 木吉他什么牌子比较好qingzhougame.com 大什么小什么zhongyiyatai.com 三途苦是指的什么travellingsim.com
百度