有胃病的人吃什么最养胃| 茵陈有什么功效| 手指起水泡是什么原因| 养殖什么赚钱| 减肥期间适合喝什么酒| 孕中期同房要注意什么| 人类免疫缺陷病毒是什么| gf是什么意思| 四维什么时候做最佳| 午时左眼跳是什么兆头| 随心所欲的欲什么意思| 什么是青光眼| 属鼠的幸运色是什么颜色| 脚掌痒是什么原因| 西葫芦不能和什么一起吃| 什么馅饺子好吃| 柠檬水喝多了有什么坏处| 女生隐私长什么样| 躺着头晕是什么原因| 眼睛模糊流泪用什么药| 与虎谋皮是什么生肖| 什么是亚麻籽油| 肚脐眼连接体内的什么器官| 725是什么意思| b站是什么| 钓黑鱼用什么饵最好| 31年属什么生肖| 祈字五行属什么| 每日家情思睡昏昏什么意思| 超敏c蛋白反应高是什么原因| 血脂是什么| 什么人不能吃火龙果| 沉默寡言是什么意思| 白露是什么意思| 11月2号什么星座| 四季豆不能和什么一起吃| 黑素瘤早期什么症状| 26度穿什么衣服合适| 月经老是提前是什么原因| 覆盆子是什么东西| 宝宝出急疹要注意什么| 为什么老长口腔溃疡| 女人没经验开什么店好| 十一月份是什么星座| 少许是什么意思| 缅甸的首都叫什么名字| 梦见闹离婚是什么意思| 芭蕉和香蕉有什么区别| 四气指的是什么| 什么是凯格尔运动| 龋坏是什么意思| 什么是双一流大学| 锦衣玉食什么意思| 面是什么做的| 经期不能吃什么水果| 阳虚水泛是什么症状| 出水痘吃什么药| 梦到前女友征兆是什么| 入职是什么意思| 江苏有什么山| 什么叫佛系| 骨膜炎是什么症状| 火棉胶婴儿是什么意思| 沈阳六院主要治什么病| 成都是什么气候| 芒种是什么意思| 玛瑙是什么| 以纯属于什么档次| 梦见腿断了是什么意思| 膀胱尿潴留是什么意思| 背疼是什么原因引起的女人| 高血压一级是什么意思| 商标r是什么意思| 乙酉是什么意思| 直男什么意思| 磷脂是什么| 维生素c不能和什么一起吃| 阴道炎是什么| 孕期吃什么长胎不长肉| 18k金是什么| 早上咳嗽是什么原因| 把你的心我的心串一串是什么歌| 十二月十号是什么星座| 避孕套和安全套有什么区别| 2004年属什么| 肺与大肠相表里是什么意思| 脂蛋白是什么意思| 西游记是什么生肖| 2022年属什么生肖| 脚底板疼痛是什么原因| 奔跑吧什么时候播出| 血压低吃什么中成药| 热火朝天是什么意思| 什么是焦虑症| 1月10号是什么星座| ag医学上是什么意思| 长宽高用什么字母表示| 狗狗吃胡萝卜有什么好处| 畏首畏尾是什么意思| 带量采购是什么意思| 月经前一周是什么期| 什么一| 什么人容易得布病| 减肥用什么好| braun是什么品牌| 中学为体西学为用是什么意思| 龙年是什么年| 喊麦什么意思| 炭疽病用什么农药最好| 限量版是什么意思| 伊朗用什么货币| 力五行属什么| mr是什么意思| 扁桃体发炎吃什么消炎药| 蛋糕裙搭配什么上衣| 过期的钙片有什么用途| 淼怎么读什么意思| 树欲静而风不止什么意思| 血管堵塞有什么办法可以疏通| hpv是指什么| 油脂是什么| 命里缺什么怎么看| 12320是什么电话| 胎盘后壁是什么意思| 壁虎怕什么| 胃不舒服能吃什么水果| 家里为什么会有蜘蛛| vb是什么意思| 121是什么意思| 胶体是什么| 嘴唇暗紫色是什么原因| 指甲变空是什么原因| 守株待兔是什么生肖| 阿胶什么时候吃效果最好| 淘米水洗脸有什么好处| iq什么意思| 汾酒属于什么香型| 苦瓜泡水喝有什么功效和作用| 尿素氮偏低是什么原因| 肚脐左边是什么器官| 肺气肿用什么药效果好| 脚背麻木是什么原因| 咳嗽挂什么科| 庹是什么意思| 肺结核什么症状| 紧张手抖吃什么药| 百日咳吃什么药| 什么是速率| 前列腺炎挂什么科| 什么火热| 不可名状的名是什么意思| c反应蛋白什么意思| 为什么一来月经就拉肚子| 出汗对身体有什么好处| 胸闷想吐是什么原因| 脑萎缩是什么原因引起的| 为什么女人要带阴环| 牙龈翻瓣术是什么意思| 男人为什么会遗精| 陪产假什么时候开始休| 颈动脉b超是检查什么| 为什么犹太人聪明| 客之痣是什么意思| 青岛啤酒节是什么时候| 眼皮水肿是什么原因引起的| 偏光镜什么意思| 床上什么虫子夜间咬人| 爱哭的人是什么性格| 奉子成婚是什么意思| 发达国家的标准是什么| 东北有什么好玩的景点| 过敏性紫癜看什么科| 月经后是什么期| 为什么一直流鼻涕| 维生素什么时候吃效果最好| 为什么会得尿毒症| 大便有点绿色是什么原因| 精华液是干什么用的| 多囊有什么危害| 断奶吃什么药| cup什么意思| 哥弟属于什么档次| 败血症吃什么药| 什么是梅尼埃病| 共产主义社会是什么样的社会| 东四命是什么意思| 鼻子有臭味是什么原因| 蚂蚁为什么会咬人| 调理是什么意思| 出生证编号是什么| 2022年是什么生肖年| 疽是什么意思| 势均力敌什么意思| 腋下大量出汗是什么原因| 降钙素原检测是什么| 草酸是什么| 猪肉炒什么菜好吃| elsa是什么意思| 饶有兴致是什么意思| 儿童坐动车需要带什么证件| 小孩血糖高是什么原因引起的| 什么是假声| 胃出血是什么原因引起的| 处女座幸运颜色是什么| 水瓶座什么象| 四月初八是什么星座| 安可是什么意思| 月非念什么| 排卵的时候有什么症状| 河南属于什么平原| 肝肿瘤吃什么食物好| penguins是什么意思| 痔疮出血用什么药| 蓝天白云是什么生肖| 人为什么会梦游| 小腿肚酸疼是什么原因| 乳腺疼挂什么科| 我不知道你在说什么英文| 病毒为什么会变异| 阴骘是什么意思| 头发油的快是什么原因| 层峦叠翠的意思是什么| 吃了虾不能吃什么| 什么原因不来月经| 拉肚子能吃什么食物| 陶渊明字什么| 蒲地蓝消炎片主治什么| 眉毛变白是什么原因| 煮牛骨头放什么调料| 铁观音是什么茶类| 为什么会得抑郁症| ggdb是什么牌子| 什么山峻岭| 坐骨神经痛用什么药| 世界大战是什么意思| 建档立卡户是什么意思| 血虚是什么意思| 暗网是什么意思| 发物都有什么| 鞭长莫及是什么意思| 吃阿胶对女人有什么好处| 甘油三酯代表什么| 引什么大叫| 来例假吃什么好| 桃花是指什么生肖| 三点水加亘念什么| 肿物是什么意思| 什么夫妻百事哀| 猪蛋是什么| 2008属什么生肖| 柱镜度数是什么意思| 妈妈姐姐的女儿叫什么| 毛宁和毛阿敏是什么关系| 2003年是什么命| 钢铁侠叫什么名字| it代表什么| 发烧能吃什么水果| 造势是什么意思| 梦见打死狗有什么预兆| 什么假什么威| 家里消毒杀菌用什么好| apm是什么| 胆结石吃什么药可以化掉结石| 乾隆和康熙是什么关系| 百度Jump to content

菜鸟“门店发货”模式升级

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
百度 当天中午,饲养员到动物展区清点补充动物情况时,发现水池下水道堵塞,便拿疏通工具准备对下水道进行疏通。

Neo-scholasticism (also known as neo-scholastic Thomism[1] or neo-Thomism because of the great influence of the writings of Thomas Aquinas on the movement) is a revival and development of medieval scholasticism in Catholic theology and philosophy which began in the second half of the 19th century.

Origins

[edit]

During the medieval period, scholasticism became the standard accepted method of philosophy and theology. The Scholastic method declined with the advent of humanism in the 15th and 16th centuries, after which time it came to be viewed by some[who?] as rigid and formalistic. "Scholastic philosophy did not, however, completely disappear. An important movement of Scholastic revival took place during the 16th and 17th centuries and enriched Scholastic literature with many eminent contributions, in addition to adapting scholastic thought to modern problems and synthesizing the currents of thought of various authors of medieval scholasticism, such as Thomism, Scotism or nominalism. Francisco de Vitoria (1483-1546), Thomas de Vio Cajetan (1469–1534), Gabriel Vásquez (1551–1604), Toletus (1532–1596), Fonseca (1528–1599), and especially Francisco Suárez (1548–1617) were profound thinkers, worthy of the great masters whose principles they had adopted."[2] Moreover, as J. A. Weisheipl emphasizes, within the Dominican Order Thomistic scholasticism has been continuous since the time of Aquinas: "Thomism was always alive in the Dominican Order, small as it was after the ravages of the Reformation, the French Revolution, and the Napoleonic occupation. Repeated legislation of the General Chapters, beginning after the death of St. Thomas, as well as the Constitutions of the Order, required all Dominicans to teach the doctrine of St. Thomas both in philosophy and in theology."[3] A further idea of the longstanding historic continuity of Dominican scholasticism and neo-scholasticism may be derived from the list of people associated with the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas.

In the mid-19th century, interest in scholastic thought began once again to flourish, in large part in reaction against the Modernist current inspired by thinkers such as René Descartes, Immanuel Kant and Georg Hegel, whose principles were perceived to conflict with Christian dogma.[4] Theological Modernism never coalesced into an authoritative doctrine; perhaps it was most clearly defined by Pius X in 1907, when he condemned it as ‘the sum of all heresies’. However, the most consistent threads of Modernist thought include: (1) the belief that revelation continues up to the present day and did not stop after the apostles; (2) the belief that dogmas are not immutable, and their formulas could change both in interpretation and content; (3) the use of the historical-critical method in biblical exegesis.[5]

For many thinkers, the dangers of Modernism could only be overcome by a complete restoration of scholastic theology which culminated in Aquinas. His writings were increasingly viewed as the ultimate expression of orthodox philosophy and theology, to which all Catholic thought must remain faithful.[6]

This was particularly vigorous at first in Italy. "The direct initiator of the neo-Scholastic movement in Italy was Gaetano Sanseverino (1811–1865), a canon at Naples."[7] The influential German Jesuit Joseph Kleutgen (1811–83), who taught at Rome, argued that post-Cartesian philosophy undermined Catholic theology, and that its remedy was the Aristotelian scientific method of Aquinas.[8] From 1874 to 1891, the Accademia di San Tommaso published the review La Scienza Italiana. Numerous works were produced by Giovanni Maria Cornoldi (1822–92), Giuseppe Pecci, Tommaso Maria Zigliara (1833–93), Satolli (1839–1909), Liberatore (1810–92), Barberis (1847–96), Schiffini (1841–1906), de Maria, Talamo, Lorenzelli, Ballerini, Mattiussi and others. The Italian writers at first laid special emphasis on the metaphysics of Scholasticism, and less on the empirical sciences or the history of philosophy.

Papal support for such trends began under Pope Pius IX, who praised the movement in various letters. The dogma of the Immaculate Conception (1854), the Syllabus of Errors (1864) and the proclamation of papal infallibility (1870) all heralded a move away from Modernist ideas.[9]

The most decisive impetus was Pope Leo XIII's encyclical Aeterni Patris of 4 August 1879, which set out and strongly endorsed the principles of neo-scholasticism, calling for "Christian philosophy to be restored according to the spirit of St Thomas".

Key principles

[edit]
Thomas Aquinas

"Neo-Scholasticism is characterized by systematic investigation, analytical rigor, clear terminology, and argumentation that proceeds from first principles, chief among them that objective truth is both real and knowable."[10] Neo-scholasticism sought to restore the fundamental doctrines embodied in the scholasticism of the 13th century, which may be summarized as follows:

1. God is pure actuality and absolute perfection, substantially distinct from every finite thing. He alone can create and preserve all beings other than Himself. His infinite knowledge includes all that was, is, or shall be, and all that is possible.

2. As to our knowledge of the material world: whatever exists is itself, an incommunicable, individual substance. To the core of self-sustaining reality, in the oak-tree for instance, other realities (accidents) are added—size, form, roughness, and so on. All oak-trees are identical in respect of certain constituent elements. Considering this likeness and even identity, our human intelligence groups them into one species and again, in view of their common characteristics, it ranges various species under one genus. Such is the Aristotelean solution of the problem of universals. Each substance is in its nature fixed and determined; and Scholasticism excludes a theory of evolution which would regard even the essences of things as products of change.

But this static conception requires as its complement a moderate dynamism, supplied by the central concepts of act and potency. Whatsoever changes is, just for that reason, limited. The oak-tree passes through a process of growth, of becoming: whatever is actually in it now was potentially in it from the beginning. Its vital functions go on unceasingly (accidental change); but the tree itself will die, and out of its decayed trunk other substances will come forth (substantial change). The theory of matter and form is simply an interpretation of the substantial changes which bodies undergo. The union of matter and form constitutes the essence of concrete being, and this essence is endowed with existence. Throughout all change and becoming there runs a rhythm of finality; the activities of the countless substances of the universe converge towards an end which is known to God; finality involves optimism.

3. Man, a compound of body (matter) and of soul (form), puts forth activities of a higher order—knowledge and volition. Through his senses he perceives concrete objects, e.g. this oak; through his intellect he knows the abstract and universal (the oak). All our intellectual activity rests on sensory function; but through the active intellect (intellectus agens) an abstract representation of the sensible object is provided for the intellectual possibility. Hence the characteristic of the idea, its non-materiality, and on this is based the principal argument for the spirituality and immortality of the soul. Here, too, is the foundation of logic and of the theory of knowledge, the justification of our judgments and syllogisms.

Upon knowledge follows the appetitive process, sensory or intellectual according to the sort of knowledge. The will (appetitus intellectualis) in certain conditions is free, and thanks to this liberty man is the master of his destiny. Like all other beings, we have an end to attain and we are morally obliged, though not compelled, to attain it.

Natural happiness would result from the full development of our powers of knowing and loving. We should find and possess God in this world since the corporeal world is the proper object of our intelligence. But above nature is the order of grace and our supernatural happiness will consist in the direct intuition of God, the beatific vision. Here philosophy ends and theology begins.

Late-19th-century spread

[edit]

In the period from the publication of Aeterni Patris in 1879 until the 1920s, neo-scholasticism gradually established itself as exclusive and all-pervading.[11]

On October 15, 1879, Leo XIII created the Pontifical Academy of St. Thomas Aquinas, and ordered the publication of the critical "Leonine Edition", of Aquinas' complete works.[12] The pope expanded Thomist studies in the Collegium Divi Thomae de Urbe (the future Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum), founding its Faculty of Philosophy in 1882 and its Faculty of Canon Law in 1896.

The thought of Thomas Aquinas gained papal ascendency over all other ‘modern’ systems of thought. In particular, the Aristotelianism of Thomas preferred to the thought of Kant.[13] Other ‘modern’ forms of thought, including ontologism, traditionalism, the dualism of Anton Günther, and the thought of Descartes, were also seen as flawed in comparison to Thomism.

The movement spread outside Italy, finding supporters in Germany,[14] Spain,[15] the Netherlands,[16] Belgium,[17] England,[18] Switzerland,[19] France,[20] Hungary,[21] the United States,[22] Argentina,[23] Mexico,[24] Brazil[25] and Australia.[26] At Louvain in Belgium (then still a francophone university), Leo XIII in 1891 established the Institut de philosophie to teach the doctrine of Aquinas together with history and the natural sciences.[27] It was endorsed by four Catholic Congresses: Paris (1891), Brussels (1895), Freiburg (1897), and Munich (1900).

Early-20th-century development

[edit]

In the early 20th century, neo-Thomism became official Catholic doctrine, and became increasingly defined in opposition to Modernism.

In July 1907, Pope Pius X issued the decree Lamentabili sane exitu, which condemned 65 Modernist propositions. Two months later, he issued the encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis, in which he unequivocally condemned the agnosticism, immanentism, and relativism of Modernism as the 'synthesis of all heresies'.[28] The anti-Modernist oath of 1910 was very important; this remained in force until 1966.[28] In 1914, Pius X issued a list of 24 philosophical propositions summarising the central tenets of neo-scholasticism to be taught in all colleges as fundamental elements of philosophy; and in 1916, these 24 propositions were confirmed as normative. In 1917, the Church's new Code of Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici) insisted that the doctrine, methods, and principles of Thomas should be used in teaching philosophy and theology.[29] Thomist thought therefore became the basis of the manuals and textbooks in Catholic colleges and seminaries before Vatican II, and was promoted also to the laity.[30]

Variation within the tradition

[edit]

Writers such as Edouard Hugon, Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange, and Henri Grenier maintained the tradition of the manuals. Others varied in their interpretation, including Martin Grabmann (1875–1949), Amato Masnovo (1880–1955), Francesco Olgiati (1886–1962), and Antonin-Dalmace Sertillanges (1863–1948).[31] Authors such as étienne Gilson, Jacques Maritain, and Joseph Maréchal investigated alternative interpretations of Aquinas from the 1920s until the 1950s. Gilson and Maritain in particular taught and lectured throughout Europe and North America, influencing a generation of English-speaking Catholic philosophers.

Historical investigation into Thomas's thought led some to believe that neo-Thomism did not always reflect the thought of Thomas Aquinas himself, as argued by writers such as étienne Gilson, Marie-Dominique Chenu, and Henri de Lubac. At Vatican II, traditional neo-Thomist thought was opposed by exponents of this nouvelle théologie.

Many Thomists, however, continue in the neo-scholastic tradition. Some relatively recent proponents are treated in Battista Mondin's Metafisica di san Tommaso d'Aquino e i suoi interpreti (2002), which treats Carlo Giacon (1900–1984), Sofia Vanni Rovighi (1908–1990), Cornelio Fabro (1911–1995), Carlo Giacon (1900–1984),[32] Tomá? Tyn (1950–1990), Abelardo Lobato (1925–2012), Leo Elders (1926–2019), and Enrico Berti (1935–2022), among others. Due to its suspicion of attempts to harmonize Aquinas with non-Thomistic categories and assumptions, neo-scholastic Thomism has sometimes been called strict observance Thomism.[1]

Anglophone theologians such as Edward Feser, Ralph McInerny, Brian Davies have defended a contemporary revival of traditional neo-scholastic Thomistic metaphysics in response to modern philosophy.[33][34]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Edward Feser (15 October 2009). "The Thomistic tradition, Part I (archived copy)". Archived from the original on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 2 January 2011. Accessed 27 March 2013
  2. ^ Joseph Louis Perrier, The Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, "Chapter VIII: "Chapter VIII: Forerunners of the Neo-Scholastic Revival," Accessed 1 August 2013
  3. ^ "The Dominican Friars of the Province of St. Albert the Great ? "The Revival of Thomism: An Historical Survey" (James Weisheipl)". Archived from the original on 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05. "The Revival of Thomism: An Historical Survey", James Weisheipl, 1962.
  4. ^ Fergus Kerr, Twentieth-century Catholic theologians, (Blackwell, 2007), p1.
  5. ^ See Jürgen Mettepenningen, Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II, (London: T&T Clark, 2010), p20.
  6. ^ This way of approaching Thomas was itself scholastic in inspiration. The scholastics used a book by a renowned scholar, called auctor, as basic course literature. By reading this book thoroughly and critically, the disciples learned to appreciate the theories of the auctor and, thus, of the problems studied in the whole discipline, in a critical and self-confident way. Scholastic works therefore have a tendency to take the form of a long list of "footnotes" to the works studied, not being able to take a stand as theories on their own.
  7. ^ Joseph Louis Perrier, The Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, "Chapter IX: The Neo-Scholastic Revival in Italy", "Jacques Maritain Center: Revival 9". Archived from the original on 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05. Accessed 1 August 2013
  8. ^ Fergus Kerr, ‘Thomism’, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology (Cambridge, 2011), p507.
  9. ^ Jürgen Mettepenningen, Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II, (London: T&T Clark, 2010), p. 19.
  10. ^ Iovino, James. "Can Neo-Scholasticism Make a Comeback?", New Oxford Review, January-February 2018
  11. ^ Jürgen Mettepenningen, Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II, (London: T&T Clark, 2010), p20.
  12. ^ Previous critical editions of Thomas’s work had been published before, at Parma in 1852-73, and in Paris in 1871-80, but the Leonine edition, produced under the guidance of Tommaso Maria Zigliara, professor of theology at the Collegium Divi Thomae de Urbe (the future Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum), superseded both of these.
  13. ^ For example, Boutroux thought that Aristotle's system might well serve as an offset to Kantism and evolution. Aristote, Etudes d'histoire et de philosophie, (Paris, 1901, 202). Moreover, Paulsen, ‘Kant der Philosoph des Protestantismus’, Kantstudien, (1899) and Eucken, Thomas von Aquino u. Kant, Ein Kampf zweier Welten, loc. cit., 1901 declared neo-Thomism the rival of Kantism, and the conflict between them the "clash of two worlds". Adolf Harnack, Lehrbuch d. Dogmengesch, III, 3rd. ed., 327, Seeberg, Realencyklop?die f. Prot. Theol. 5. v. "Scholastik" and others argued against underrating the value of scholastic doctrine.
  14. ^ Such as Kleutgen (1811–83) and St?ckl (1823–95), and the authors of the "Philosophia Lacensis" published at Maria Laach by the Jesuits (Pesch, Hontheim, Cathrein), Gutberlet, Commer, Willmann, Kaufmann, Glossner, Grabmann and Schneid.
  15. ^ Such as Gonzalez (1831–92), Orti y Lara, Urráburu, and Gómez Izquierdo
  16. ^ Such as de Groot
  17. ^ Such as de San (1832–1904), Dupont and Lepidi
  18. ^ Clarke, Maher, John Rickaby, Joseph Rickaby, Boedder (Stonyhurst Series)
  19. ^ Such as Mandonnet at Freiburg.
  20. ^ Such as Farges, Dormet de Vorges (1910), Vallet, Gardair, Fonsegrive and Piat
  21. ^ Kiss and Pécsi.
  22. ^ Such as Coppens, Poland, Brother Chrysostom, and the professors at the Catholic University (Shanahan, Turner, and Pace).
  23. ^ Julio Meinvielle and Nimio de Anquín
  24. ^ Garcia
  25. ^ Santroul
  26. ^ "Toongabbie's Thomist philosopher". Catholic Outlook. 2025-08-05. Retrieved 2025-08-05.
  27. ^ The Institute was placed in charge of Désiré-Joseph Mercier whose "Cours de philosophie" was translated into many major European languages.
  28. ^ a b Hans Boersma, Nouvelle Theologie and Sacramental Ontology: A Return to Mystery, (Oxford: OUP, 2009), p18.
  29. ^ Jürgen Mettepenningen, Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II, (London: T&T Clark, 2010), p25.
  30. ^ Ryan, P.J. (17 May 1934). "The fundamental tenets of scholasticism: old and new". Catholic Press. Sydney. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
  31. ^ Battista Mondin's Metafisica di san Tommaso d'Aquino e i suoi interpreti (2002)
  32. ^ "GIACON, Carlo in "Dizionario Biografico"". www.treccani.it. Retrieved 9 April 2013.
  33. ^ "Edward Feser: A Neo-Scholastic revival?". 30 November 2008.
  34. ^ Feser, Edward (15 October 2009). "The Thomistic tradition (Part 1)". Retrieved 2025-08-05.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Boersma, Hans, Nouvelle Theologie and Sacramental Ontology: A Return to Mystery, (Oxford: OUP, 2009)
  • Cessario, R, A Short History of Thomism, (2005)
  • Kerr, Fergus, After Aquinas: Versions of Thomism, (2002)
  • Kerr, Fergus, Twentieth-century Catholic theologians, (Blackwell, 2007),
  • Kerr, Fergus, ‘Thomism’, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology, (Cambridge, 2011)
  • Mettepenningen, Jürgen, Nouvelle Théologie - New Theology: Inheritor of Modernism, Precursor of Vatican II, (London: T&T Clark, 2010)
  • Aveling, F. "The Neo-Scholastic Movement," The American Catholic Quarterly Review, Vol. XXXI, 1906.
  • Public Domain Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Neo-Scholasticism". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  • Many philosophical and theological journals focus on neo-Scholasticism: Divus Thomas (since 1879); Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica (Milan, since 1909); Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne (Paris, 1830-1913); Revue néo-scolastique de Philosophie (Louvain, since 1894); Revue de Philosophie (Paris, since 1900); Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques (Kain, Belgium, since 1907); Revue thomiste (Paris, since 1893); Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Philosophie und spekulative Theologie (Paderborn, since 1887); St. Thomas Bl?tter (Ratisbon, since 1888); B?lcseleti-Folyóirat (Budapest, since 1886); Revista Lulliana (Barcelona, since 1901); Ciencia Tomista (Madrid, since 1910). Angelicum, since 1924; The Modern Schoolman since 1925, New Scholasticism since 1927 which became American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly in 1989, The Thomist since 1939.
[edit]
  • Scholasticon by Jacob Schmutz Online Resources for the study of early-modern scholasticism (1500–1800): authors, sources, institutions (in French)
阻生齿是什么 肝胆胰脾挂什么科 41年属什么生肖 林子祥属什么生肖 love是什么词性
脑供血不足什么原因 覆水难收什么意思 坐月子吃什么下奶最快最多最有效 已所不欲勿施于人是什么意思 去年的树告诉我们什么
诸什么意思 贫血的人吃什么好 什么是腱鞘炎 白羊女跟什么星座最配 为什么不能下午看病人
丙寅五行属什么 细小是什么 mmf是什么药 治痛风吃什么药 太阳光是什么颜色
清热燥湿是什么意思hcv8jop1ns1r.cn 什么水果对心脏有好处hcv7jop4ns6r.cn 什么是男人hcv9jop2ns4r.cn 男性囊肿是什么引起的hcv9jop8ns2r.cn 舌头肿了是什么原因hcv8jop9ns6r.cn
1月23号什么星座hcv7jop9ns7r.cn 复刻是什么意思inbungee.com 头发沙发是什么意思hcv9jop6ns7r.cn 3月16号是什么星座的hcv8jop5ns7r.cn 黄芪有什么好处hcv7jop5ns0r.cn
膝盖积液用什么药最好hcv9jop5ns0r.cn asmr是什么意思hcv8jop7ns2r.cn 小狗感冒了吃什么药hcv7jop9ns2r.cn 金樱子泡酒有什么功效hcv9jop2ns3r.cn 718是什么星座hcv9jop0ns2r.cn
鼻子经常出血是什么原因hcv8jop0ns7r.cn 用什么自慰hcv8jop3ns6r.cn 新生儿超敏c反应蛋白高说明什么hcv9jop5ns6r.cn ceq是什么意思hcv8jop2ns1r.cn 春占生女是什么意思hcv9jop4ns0r.cn
百度